Supreme Court Exposes ‘Perverse’ Findings Against Anas — A Crushing Blow to Adolph Tetteh’s Claims

In a dramatic and far-reaching turn in the long-running Tseaddo land dispute, the Supreme Court of Ghana has delivered a decisive blow to the credibility of arguments advanced by businessman Adolph Tetteh, describing key findings of the Court of Appeal on which he built his public and legal campaign—as “perverse,” “unsupported by evidence,” and legally untenable.

This is one of the strongest rebukes an appellate court decision can receive, and it completely dismantles the foundation of Adolf Tetteh’s claim.

Supreme Court Confirms Anas’s Earlier Right

The Court affirmed that Anas Aremeyaw Anas had ample, credible, and corroborated evidence of obtaining a customary land grant in 2005, a full eight years before Tetteh’s own purported chain of title emerged.

This earlier grant, the Court noted, was:
• supported by multiple witnesses,
• consistent with litigation records,
• and aligned with the recognized ownership of the Ataa Tawiah Tsinaiatse and Numo Ofoley Kwashei families, who had lawful possession acknowledged in a 2001 Consent Judgment.

A Narrative of Falsehood Collapses

For years, supporters of Adolph Tetteh pushed the narrative that Anas fabricated his claim or had no legitimate entry point into the land.
The Supreme Court’s ruling destroys that narrative completely.

Legal experts say the ruling is not just a correction—it is an exposure.

Why Was Adolph Fighting for Land He Knew Came Later?

The ruling raises a troubling question that many in the community have asked quietly but now feel emboldened to state openly:

Why did Adolph Tetteh wage a hostile, years-long campaign over land he knew he acquired much later than Anas?

In light of the Supreme Court’s findings, the chronology speaks for itself:
• Anas: 2005
• Hillsview (Adolph’s assignor): 2007
• Adolph’s own acquisition: 2013

Despite this clear timeline, Tetteh:
• deployed land guards,
• used intimidation tactics,
• filed aggressive court actions,
• and publicly presented himself as the rightful owner.

The Supreme Court ruling now exposes these actions as baseless and misleading.

Court of Appeal Findings Labeled “Unreasonable”

Perhaps the most devastating part of the judgment is the Supreme Court’s assessment that the Court of Appeal:
• ignored relevant evidence,
• misinterpreted the record,
• and drew conclusions that had no factual foundation.

This means that Tetteh’s entire public posture—built on the Appeal Court’s ruling—rested on findings that Ghana’s apex court has now rejected as unreasonable.

A Major Turning Point in the Tseaddo Dispute

The ruling significantly shifts the momentum of the case and the public narrative.
It restores Anas’s credibility, strengthens his legal position, and exposes deep weaknesses—and possible bad faith—in Tetteh’s long-held claims.

Legal observers note that, with the Supreme Court categorically recognizing Anas’s 2005 grant, Tetteh’s competing claim now appears chronologically impossible, legally fragile, and morally questionable.

This decision may mark the beginning of the end of one of Tseaddo’s most contentious—and aggressively fought—land battles.